(None-Data) - WAVE WSMP

Description

This solution is used within the U.S.. It combines standards associated with (None–Data) with those for V–X: WAVE WSMP. The (None–Data) standards include an unspecified set of standards at the upper layers. The V–X: WAVE WSMP standards include lower–layer standards that support connectionless, near constant, ultra–low latency vehicle–to–any communications within ~300m using the WAVE Short Messaging Protocol (WSMP) over IEEE WAVE in the 5.9GHz spectrum. The broadcast mode is interoperable with M5 FNTP.

Includes Standards

LevelDocNumFullNameDescription
MgmtAddressed ElsewhereAddressed Elsewhere in StackThe services related to this portion of the stack are defined in the other standards listed for this solution.
SecurityIEEE 1609.2IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments – Security Services for Applications and Management MessagesThis standard defines secure message formats and processing for use by Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) devices, including methods to secure WAVE management messages and methods to secure application messages. It also describes administrative functions necessary to support the core security functions.
SecurityIEEE 1609.2aIEEE 1609.2a–2017 – IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments––Security Services for Applications and Management Messages – Amendment 1This standard defines secure message formats and processing for use by Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) devices, including methods to secure WAVE management messages and methods to secure application messages. It also describes administrative functions necessary to support the core security functions.
SecurityIEEE 1609.2bIEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments––Security Services for Applications and Management Messages – Amendment 2––PDU Functional Types and Encryption Key ManagementThis standard defines secure message formats and processing for use by Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) devices, including methods to secure WAVE management messages and methods to secure application messages. It also describes administrative functions necessary to support the core security functions.
ITS Application Entity Standard(s) need to be developedOne or more standards need to be developed for this subject matter before this is considered a complete solution.
Facilities Standard(s) need to be developedOne or more standards need to be developed for this subject matter before this is considered a complete solution.
TransNetIEEE 1609.3IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) – Networking ServicesThis standard defines the network and transport layer options for the WAVE environment. The standard defines three options: a bandwidth efficient single–hop solution known as WSMP, UDP/IP, and TCP/IP. It has been harmonized with ISO FNTP and FSAP – a common message format specified in ISO 16460.
AccessIEEE 1609.4IEEE Draft Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments – Multi–Channel OperationThis standard primarily defines the data link layer of the WAVE communications stack.
AccessIEEE 802.11IEEE Draft Standard for Information technology––Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks––Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) SpecificatioThis standard defines the physical and data link layers for wireless Ethernet, including WiFi and DSRC.
AccessISO/IEC 8802–2IEEE Standard for Information technology –– Telecommunications and information exchange between systems––Local and metropolitan area networks –– Specific requirements –– Part 2: Logical Link ControlISO/IEC 8802–2 describes the logical link control (LLC) sublayer, which constitutes the top sublayer in the data link layer of the ISO 8802 Local Area Network Protocol (also known as IEEE 802.2).

Readiness: Lowest

Readiness Description

Many serious issues. This category includes solutions that have not been standardized, or do not have a basic level of interoperability or security. Consider selecting a different communications solution or if this is not possible (eg. a pilot of a new application that has not been standardized), take additional measures to provide an acceptable level of security or interoperability.

Issues

IssueSeverityDescriptionAssociated StandardAssociated Triple
Data profile not definedUltraPerformance, functionality, and the upper–layers of the OSI stack have not been defined for this information flow.(None)(All)
Overlap of standardsMediumMultiple standards have been developed to address this information and it is unclear which standard should be used to address this specific information flow.Bundle: WAVE – Subnet(All)
Uncertainty about trust revocation mechanismMediumThe mechanisms used to prevent bad actors from sending authorized messages is unproven.Bundle: IEEE 1609.2(All)

Supports Interfaces

SourceDestinationFlow
Des Moines Area VehiclesDes Moines Connected Vehicle Roadside Equipmentautomated vehicle control status
Des Moines Area VehiclesDes Moines Connected Vehicle Roadside Equipmentvehicle platoon coordination
Des Moines Connected Vehicle Roadside EquipmentDes Moines Area Vehiclesautomated vehicle control parameters